“Will you see the movie?” That’s a question going around America right now.

Reviews have generally been positive, but there’s no doubt it’s an intense movie and will bring back a flood of memories from that fateful day. Reviewer Bill McCuddy recently warned potential viewers they would “go down into the ground” with the airplane.

In any conflict it’s important for the public to understand the reason to place men and treasure in harm’s way, and the war on Islamic terror is no different. Of all the events on September the 11th Flight 93 was obviously a tiny ray of sunshine poking through a very dark cloud.

The only constructive reason to capture it on film, or for that matter see it, would be to learn from it. Movies about the other three flights would serve no other purpose but to glorify the terrorists. Flight 93 was about fighting back. As someone recently said, those passengers, through cellphone and airphone technology, grimly understood their fate and decided to launch the first counterattack of the war.

Any discussion of this subject would be incomplete without mentioning the effect the Iraq war might be having on the memory of the actions of those passengers. Regardless of which side one takes, the answer wouldn’t change the fact that certain Islamist groups wanted to kill as many innocent people as possible before the Iraq decision was made, and we have no reason to believe they’ve changed their minds.

Personally, I plan to see the film. Part of that decision is due to historical curiosity–I’m interested to see how they portray the FAA, DoD and airlines involved in the day’s events amidst a blevy of conspiracy theories on the web. But mostly it’s a desire to be reminded that there are still heroes in this world and on why we need to continue the fight.

MORE

John Podhoretz provides a very well-thought out review of the movie and why Americans should see it.

The Right Truth blog also has a review, which includes the following:

Writer / director / producer Paul Greengrass is a liberal. He says we must put our liberal and conservative views aside when it comes to this terror and protecting the United States. Rush Limbaugh has done a sit-down interview with Mr. Greengrass. The printed interview will come out in the next three weeks in the Limbaugh Letter. He is airing excepts from the interview on his radio show.

Joke about Rush if you like (he deserves some of it), and remind us he’ll put his own spin on it (he will), but Mr. Greengrass’s perspective is the important thing here. George Bush will be gone in a few years, and if the republicans continue their foot-shooting ways the democrats might wake up back in power, despite Howard Dean. But such events won’t change the terrorist mission statement one bit.

Is there a worse public speaker in the Senate than Susan Collins (R-ME)? It must be the way she puts AN. EQUAL. EMPHAISIS. ON. EVERY. WORD. SHE. SPEAKS.

As if that weren’t painful enough, Collins’ latest news conference had her paired up with Sen. Joe “Lullaby” Lieberman (D-CT). This dynamic duo stole the show yesterday with *shocker* criticism of the Bush administration’s handling of Katrina.

As Chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, it was Collins’ pleasure to annouce the committee’s new best seller, “Hurricane Katrina: A Nation Still Unprepared.” You heard right — according to the United States Senate, we’re still unprepared for a hurricance that hit last year. Actually, isn’t that pretty much par for the course for big government?

The big recommendation of the report is this: to abolish the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and replace it with “a stronger authority” called the National Preparedness and Response Authority (NPRA). So the Senate wants to fix a “bumbling bureaucracy” by creating an even larger bureaucracy; leave it to government to fix big government with bigger government.

Meanwhile, Collins’ Republican colleagues were hard at work drafting “solutions” to our nation’s “energy crisis.” The plan’s centerpiece involves mailing out $100 tax rebate checks to help taxpayers purchase gasoline. How does the Senate plan to offset tax revenue? According to Senator John Thune (R-SD), the legislation “would suspend a number of tax credits and royalty waivers received by oil corporations.”

As James Taranto notes,

Thune is going to cut taxes on the purchasers of fuel and make up for it by raising taxes on the producers of fuel. Whatever the merits of the tax breaks he proposes suspending, it seems clear that the producers would pass the costs on to the consumers.

In other words, the Senate wants to rob Peter to pay Peter.

The shakeup at the Bush White House continued today with the announcement of Tony Snow as new press secretary. Ironically, another Snow may be leaving. Rumors continue to swirl that Treasury Secretary John Snow might soon decide to spend more time with the family.

But first, the incoming Snow. The departure of spokesman Scott McClellan was certainly past due. Meeting the White House press corps every day is a thankless job, and it’s frankly amazing he lasted this long. Most two-term presidencies go through four or five in the span of eight years.

Snow was certainly qualified for the job, perhaps overly qualified. He previously worked in the Bush 41 White House and will not be intimidated by the likes of Helen Thomas or David Gregory. But the move will obviously not come without controversy, matter of fact the match has already been lit:

“Tony Snow represents more of the same, not the fresh start the Administration needed,” said Democratic National Committee Communications Director Karen Finney. “This is an interdepartmental move from one part of the conservative infrastructure to another that allows a darling of the right-wing to deliver the same misleading message, cherry-picked information and spin to the American people.”

Ok, it’s not like the DNC was going to praise the move. Surely the democrats would find similar ways to spin had Bush been able to select the Pope as press secretary.

Snow better check his skin depth for thickness now. He might well become the butt of jokes and fodder for late night talk shows, along with Fox News itself. The democrats might even coin ’snow job’ as a jingle or somesuch for their fall election strategy. If so, it’s hard to say whether such a tactic might work, but the reaction today proves that both sides will happily exploit whatever falls into their partisan laps.

As a routine listener of Snow’s radio show I can attest to the fact that he’s a much more broad-minded individual compared to his competitors. While he did occasionally bash republicans, he also wasn’t immune from losing his cool when arguing with lefties. He’ll be dealing with a real snake pit in his new job, so it will be interesting to see whether he can bite his lip. A press secretary simply cannot go off on personal tangents.

Obviously the other factor is his existing relationship with the DC press. Since most in the press corps already considered Fox an arm of the White House before the announcement, this move surely solidifies that notion. Therefore, some mainstreamers might see this as an in-your-face act of war and retaliate accordingly. Bringing down Tony might could become a sport, especially since Snow has been promised a voice inside the White House inner circle.

And what of the other Snow? John has been a rumored short-timer since the Dubai Ports brouhaha and nothing has changed. At the time the criticism was based on his inability to get the message out about the economy–the man simply has ’stodgy CEO’ written all over him. Some in the party were reportedly frustrated that Bush hadn’t benefitted in the polls from the improving economy and that’s certainly still true–the daily message coming from the media continues to be the impending civil war in Iraq and spiralling gas costs.

Not sure a new treasury secretary nor press secretary can change that dynamic, but at this point a change can’t hurt.

The following article is an excerpt from our April issue. Have you subscribed yet to the leading conservative magazine in West Tennessee? Subscribe online, its safe and easy.

By Chuck Bates

When I first started this series of articles on MLGW my intent was to raise awareness and expose some of the cronyism and waste taking place at our local utility. What I did not know at the time is just how big a mess I would find. I have had the opportunity to interview past and present employees of the utility in an effort to answer the questions plaguing many ratepayers such as, just where does all that money go that we send to MLGW every month? What is that Purchased Gas Adjustment on our bills? Who decides what we are charged? I did find answers to those questions and in the process it opened up a whole new can of worms as to how badly mismanaged MLGW really is.

I learned that more than one department where the ‘brain trust’ had left, slots were being filled by folks who really have no training for those positions. This is not only an issue of lack of proper staffing in the rates or budget department but the new General Auditor of MLGW, the position responsible for double checking the other departments for accuracy and accountability, does not have any credentials with regard to internal auditing and actually transferred to the job from the Information Systems department, (that means computers to you and me). As a matter of fact she was chosen despite there being four more qualified internal staff with auditing or accounting credentials.

If you are wondering who is placing these folks in positions they may or may not have the training for you can look no further than the Human Resources department run by a fellow who was once rejected for the position by the MLGW board and later forced in by Joseph Lee. So essentially it would at least appear that Mr. Lee himself is running the ship in to the ground personally.

All of us remember Hurricane Elvis a couple of years ago. That one storm damaged or destroyed 80% of MLGW infrastructure. Despite such devastation the former leadership of the utility had the system back up and running in a few short weeks. This was an incredible feat. An unfortunate reality is that a similar percentage of the previous management has now left the utility or been forced out by the regime of Joseph Lee. (more…)